Tatum Bell, “Pacman” Jones, and the Upcoming Draft

March 22, 2008 on 8:55 am | In Uncategorized |

The dysfunctional soap opera that has severely damaged the Lions internally for years, has been given a more public view of late, based on comments recently made by RB Tatum Bell. Bell said that former Lions offensive coordinator Mike Martz quit speaking to him when the team decided to supplant Bell with Kevin Jones, after Jones had fully recovered from his Lisfranc foot injury.

Bell also indicated that he had a poor relationship with former running backs coach Wilbert Montgomery, a staunch Martz protege. How are the Lions supposed to honestly expect any sort of professionalism from their players, when the coaches aren’t able to utilize any of their own.

Bell has also mentioned 1300 yards and 15 TD’s as reasonable goals for the ‘08 season. He also revealed that the current offensive coaching staff really extended themselves in their attempt to convince the Lions front office that Bell should return in ‘08, which ultimately factored into his decision to return.

Cutting through the spin a bit, both parties actually desperately needed each other, Bell had few suitors and the Lions were planning on soon releasing Kevin Jones, and the Lions have done a poor job of concealing the fact that they are likely to select a running back within the early rounds of the upcoming draft.

This infernally stupid decision has been commented upon previously here but, given the fact that Bell has never been an every down back and is unlikely to be able to carry that kind of load throughout an entire season, the Lions really have no other choice.

The Lions have been mentioned as having some interest in embattled Titans CB Adam “Pacman” Jones. Jones’ agent stated that the Lions are among three teams who have seriously inquired about Jones.

Matt Millen responded by stating that the Lions would not acquire Jones, but they wished him the best wherever he may eventually land. In this case, the Lions are probably smart to stay away from Jones, and his immense baggage. That being said, Jones, if he were acquired, would have represented a big jump in athleticism and intangible play-making ability, both of which are elements that are sorely lacking on the defensive side of the ball for the team.

The Lions have about a month of serious draft consideration left.   All signs point to them selecting a running back in the first round, which is actually the type of decision which has kept them mired in sub-mediocrity for so long.  The prudent decision would be to continue to add talent and depth to their offensive and defensive lines, which would actually add a stronger organizational foundation with which they can build upon.

2 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. They still don’t understand that if a RB is only as good as his line allows him to be. Their plan had always been to create the greatest show on earth bringing in all of these big name recievers. There still isn’t any stage for the greatest show on earth to perform on, meaning the offensive line. After seeing the recent success of the Colts, Giants, and the Patriots, how can they not see that the key to a successful playoff team is in the line, on both sides of the ball. And letting go of Duckett was not the greatest idea. He is the best back I have seen in years, he has the ability to make something out of nothing and will find himself in the pro bowl this year on the seahawks.

    Comment by Danny — March 27, 2008 #

  2. Danny, I agree. I was 100% behind taking Johnson and still like the pick. However, add Joe Thomas to the ‘07 Lions and they stand a very good chance of making the playoffs, something Johnson clearly could not contribute.

    I like Duckett. However, I don’t believe he wanted to return. It was clearly in his best interest to sign with Seattle, until they also signed Julius Jones, too.

    The Lions may eventually realize that you have to walk before you can run. The foundation has to be laid and fully completed, before you can build on top of it.

    Comment by Steve — March 29, 2008 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^