Lions QB Situation, Is a Culpepper Signing Imminent?
October 30, 2008 on 3:23 pm | In Uncategorized |After reviewing the recent Lions/Redskins game, and taking a holistic view of Dan Orlovsky’s, aka “The Polish Pop Gun”, body of work as a starting QB, I believe it is safe to assume that Orlovsky will never be more than the competent, turnover-free, game manager that he has been thus far.
The Lions offense is severely hamstrung by having Orlovsky at the helm, however. He has a penchant for the “check down”, or exhibiting compulsive audible syndrome (CAS) when facing an oncoming blitz, much like one of his predecessors, “Joey Checkdown”.
Orlovsky essentially plays the game so close to the vest that the only good thing that you can say about his performance is that he doesn’t make too many mistakes.
Meanwhile, the Lions under-utilize, or downright ignore, their only chance to attack opposing defense’s (Calvin Johnson, Kevin Smith) when Orlovsky is at the helm. When you feature a defense as bad as the Lions currently possess, well, you kinda can see the results.
So that brings us to our favorite stage of the season, If Orlovsky isn’t the convenient panacea for the Lions ills, now what? The Lions have looked at both Tim Rattay and Daunte Culpepper, with Culpepper appearing to be the Lions preference, at this point.
Culpepper, who has to ask himself why he has to now play for one of the few teams he could actually defeat with relative ease, is a lumbering shell of his former self, at this point.
With Culpepper’s large frame and shredded knees, both contributing to a noticeable lack of mobility, one has to wonder how desperate he ACTUALLY is to return to the NFL. He has cannon of an arm, but he has never proven to be a particularly quick-reader of opposing defenses or astute decision-maker, either.
With the bumbling tandem of the spinning-turnstile Lions offensive line and the Lions receivers continued blown routes and dropped passes, Culpepper will be facing a Sisyphean uphill struggle, given his own obvious deficiencies.
Which leads to the obvious question, why was Jon Kitna placed on IR, again? Or If Culpepper was a potential signee, and the Lions could have signed him entering the season as a backup for Kitna, why didn’t they follow that path? The Lions could have vetted Culpepper for this very moment, rather than potentially thrusting him into their current disastrous milieu.
In regards to Kitna, the Lions placing him upon injured reserve seems more and more vengeful each day, rather than based on the actual severity of his injuries.
It is not debatable that Kitna was truly awful this season, and there is a distinct possibility that a Culpepper-to-Johnson combo could rival the success Culpepper-to-Moss, but I highly doubt it.
That being said, the Lions are now in a position, without Kitna, where they have to give Culpepper a multi-year deal, something that is both irresponsible and patently unfair to the new, incoming front office. If Kitna were now available, couldn’t he return to the starting lineup, and continue to buy the plucky Mike McMah–er, I mean Drew Stanton, the time necessary for him to eventually get his shot?
The Lions are quite likely going to seriously consider drafting a franchise QB in the ‘09 draft, too. With that in mind, maybe the best answer is, to cut Drew Stanton, bid adieu to Jon Kitna, bypass signing Culpepper and allow “The Polish Pop Gun” to ride off into the sunset, meanwhile, standing pat with their current situation in the interim?
Then the Lions can completely start anew, with a new front office staff, coaching staff, and a talented, young, untainted QB much like the Atlanta Falcons did this season, with a couple of convenient stop-gap measures (ala Orlovsky, et al.) put in place, too.
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
Bringing in Culpepper is just another dumb as thing to do. He can’t do anything at his point but posibly blow the 1st pick in the draft for us. Maybe we don’t want the first pick, we could trade it away. Dan and Drew are fine for now, the season is more than a lost cause. So Dan doesn’t take risks, he is learning plenty and not doing too bad considering his crap OL. We might screw around and have a young QB learn something. At this point, does it matter if Calvin gets the ball? Isn’t it enough that he get game reps and learn to run crisp routes and be ready for a break out year next year and the year after? Like I have said before, these are all just more exhibition games to add to the four we have next year. Let our young guys learn and if we happen to win too, good, if not, so what. Winning is a pipe dream at this point. We need new/different goals for this season.
Comment by Mike — October 30, 2008 #
Mike–I agree, the Lions should pass on Culpepper if he is going to receive a multi-year deal. With the salary cap factored, I guess it’s more important, in the long run, what his eventual signing bonus would be, and how it’s spread across the length of the deal. I do believe that the current front office shouldn’t saddle anyone, even if they are ultimately retained, with bad deals while the team resides at rock bottom.
The Lions coaches are stil trying to win. They aren’t concerned about draft picks, etc. With all of the empty seats, and five home games remaining, I believe that the Lions ownership and front office want to do everything in their power to fill those seats, and avoid black-outs. Winning factors heavily on this situation. Obviously, the stadium will be near-full against the Titans on Thanksgiving, otherwise, it likely could double as a mausoleum, which is likely prompting the Lions to view things less proactively.
The Lions coaches aren’t going to give Stanton a chance, even out of desperation, it appears. They don’t believe he is ready, according to the recent press conferences that they have held. Orlovsky’s bland, impotent command of the Lions unimaginative, stale offense will lead only to losses, and an abundance of ennui!
Comment by Steve — October 31, 2008 #