Lions Sign Special Teams Ace LB Landon Johnson, Pursuit of DL Anthony Hargrove and, gulp, CB/RS “Pacman” Jones Still on the Table?

March 22, 2010 on 12:26 pm | In Uncategorized |

Can “Pacman” Jones make it rain in Windsor? If Jim Schwartz and the Lions front office are sufficiently convinced that the talented, but troubled cornerback is serious about a return, the Lions are likely very interested.

I Bet "Pacman" Has Fewer Dollars to "Rain" With Now!

Jones Has Fewer Dollars to “Rain” With Now!

Jones, a gifted playmaker, is still only 27 and, by all accounts, is in great shape and primed for a return. The Lions, not usually prone to Faustian deals with the devil, likely are in a position, even with the additions of CB’s Chris Houston and Jonathan Wade, where they have no choice but to extend Jones an offer.

Jones would also provide the team with a credible addition to their punt returns game, which has been a team weakness for several years now.

Jim Schwartz has coached Jones before, and has had considerable success with troubled, reclamation projects, to his credit (see Haynesworth, Albert). Many Lions fans will not be happy that the Lions are considering the addition of a grade-A turd like Jones, but to quote a friend, “if Idi Amin Dada could consistently make tackles while playing on the defensive line, sign him!”

Would Amin Have Played Well "Inside of the Phone Booth"?

Amin Looks Like a Defensive
Lineman to Me.

The Lions have until April 15th to consider signing (and giving a 3rd round draft pick as compensation for signing Hargrove) restricted free agent DT/DE Anthony Hargrove (and also formerly troubled), from the New Orleans Saints.

If the Lions add Hargrove and Jones, calculated risks that they may be, they will possess the faint outline of moderately good defense. At this point, I am not sure how the Lions can afford to not take the plunge, and roll the dice.

Johnson (59) Gives the Lions Much Needed Depth

Johnson (59) Gives the Lions Some Much Needed Depth

The Lions also recently added MLB Landon Johnson, who will join the “Pain Train” (a.k.a. Jordan Dizon and Zach Follett) and Vinny Ciurciu as the team’s special teams coverage stalwarts.

Johnson also provides the Lions with some much needed depth (after the loss of Larry Foote) at inside linebacker, and conceivably, could allow the team to be able to shift DeAndre Levy around, when necessary.

In the end, as a long suffering Lions fan, I believe that the team’s personnel situation needs improvement, despite any objections that I could possibly have over the addition of “Pacman” Jones in the upcoming weeks. In the end, I guess I have an analogous level of restraint and integrity as that of the those strippers that Jones “rained upon” a few years ago. My bad.

4 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Have they given up on Sammy Hill already? Do they think he is just a “depth” level talent at this point?

    Comment by Mike — March 22, 2010 #

  2. No, Mike, I think they really like Hill. A defensive line is better with a quality rotation, for stamina purposes.

    Schwartz likes players who are able to play multiple positions, and Hargrove and Corey Williams can play both outside as DE’s, and slide to the inside on passing downs(think Kevin Carter, in his prime). Hargroves flourishes in that role, actually.

    I believe that Corey Williams, Hill, and hopefully, Suh or McCoy could be a really good start for the Lions defensive front.

    If the Lions D-Line is better, it protects their secondary, which is obviously weak.

    Comment by Steve — March 23, 2010 #

  3. “…,The Lions, not usually prone to Faustian deals with the devil, likely are in a position, even with the additions of CB’s Chris Houston and Jonathan Wade, where they have no choice but to extend Jones an offer,…”

    Why not? As long as he can play and there isn’t guaranteed money involved, but an incentive based contract is used- I think they can’t lose.

    I can’t be as bad as this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c_fm7oNUi4

    Comment by thibodeaux41 — March 28, 2010 #

  4. What good can come from this? If he plays well, so what, he’s supposed to…If he blows up off the field…so what..it’s expected..if he doesn’t play well..what a crappy pickup.

    If we want to take a risk on a dud, I’d rather have the background off the field out of the equation.

    Comment by Kevin — April 3, 2010 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^